[HTML][HTML] Mechanisms of resistance to decitabine in the myelodysplastic syndrome

T Qin, R Castoro, S El Ahdab, J Jelinek, X Wang, J Si… - PloS one, 2011 - journals.plos.org
T Qin, R Castoro, S El Ahdab, J Jelinek, X Wang, J Si, J Shu, R He, N Zhang, W Chung
PloS one, 2011journals.plos.org
Purpose The DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC) is approved for the
treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but resistance to DAC develops during
treatment and mechanisms of resistance remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated
mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to DAC in MDS. Patients and Methods We
performed Quantitative Real-Time PCR to examine expression of genes related to DAC
metabolism prior to therapy in 32 responders and non-responders with MDS as well as 14 …
Purpose
The DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC) is approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but resistance to DAC develops during treatment and mechanisms of resistance remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to DAC in MDS.
Patients and Methods
We performed Quantitative Real-Time PCR to examine expression of genes related to DAC metabolism prior to therapy in 32 responders and non-responders with MDS as well as 14 patients who achieved a complete remission and subsequently relapsed while on therapy (secondary resistance). We then performed quantitative methylation analyses by bisulfite pyrosequencing of 10 genes as well as Methylated CpG Island Amplification Microarray (MCAM) analysis of global methylation in secondary resistance.
Results
Most genes showed no differences by response, but the CDA/DCK ratio was 3 fold higher in non-responders than responders (P<.05), suggesting that this could be a mechanism of primary resistance. There were no significant differences at relapse in DAC metabolism genes, and no DCK mutations were detected. Global methylation measured by the LINE1 assay was lower at relapse than at diagnosis (P<.05). On average, the methylation of 10 genes was lower at relapse (16.1%) compared to diagnosis (18.1%) (P<.05).MCAM analysis showed decreased methylation of an average of 4.5% (range 0.6%–9.7%) of the genes at relapse. By contrast, new cytogenetic changes were found in 20% of patients.
Conclusion
Pharmacological mechanisms are involved in primary resistance to DAC, whereas hypomethylation does not prevent a relapse for patients with DAC treatment.
PLOS